SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 183

P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
Nurani Jamal – Appellant
Versus
Naram Srinivasa Rao – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner being the legal representatives of one Jaheen Jamal alias Rumani (since deceased) filed this revision questioning the order made in I. A. No. 1586/ 89 filed by them under O. 22, R. 3, C. P. C. seeking to be impleaded as petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 in O. P. 79/86 on the file of the III Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (III Additional District Judge) Kakinada.

( 2 ) ONE Jaheen Jamal alias Rumani, filed O. P. 79/86 claiming compensation for the injury sustained by him in a motor accident against the respondents. While the said O. P. was pending, Jaheen Jamal alias Rumani died in another motor accident on 3-4-1987 leaving behind him petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 who are his parents and wife. As he died pending O. P. , the petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 filed I. A. 1586/89 for impleading them as petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 in the said original petition on the ground that Jaheen Jamal alias Rumani claimed a sum of Rs. 18,286. 55 Ps. towards the amount that was spent in respect of the treatment he took for the injuries received in the accident and therefore, as the loss is to the estate of the deceased, they are entitled to continue the O. P. as his legal




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top