P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
Nurani Jamal – Appellant
Versus
Naram Srinivasa Rao – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner being the legal representatives of one Jaheen Jamal alias Rumani (since deceased) filed this revision questioning the order made in I. A. No. 1586/ 89 filed by them under O. 22, R. 3, C. P. C. seeking to be impleaded as petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 in O. P. 79/86 on the file of the III Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (III Additional District Judge) Kakinada.
( 2 ) ONE Jaheen Jamal alias Rumani, filed O. P. 79/86 claiming compensation for the injury sustained by him in a motor accident against the respondents. While the said O. P. was pending, Jaheen Jamal alias Rumani died in another motor accident on 3-4-1987 leaving behind him petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 who are his parents and wife. As he died pending O. P. , the petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 filed I. A. 1586/89 for impleading them as petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 in the said original petition on the ground that Jaheen Jamal alias Rumani claimed a sum of Rs. 18,286. 55 Ps. towards the amount that was spent in respect of the treatment he took for the injuries received in the accident and therefore, as the loss is to the estate of the deceased, they are entitled to continue the O. P. as his legal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.