SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 231

S.S.M.QUADRI
Kantamaneni Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Meka Venkateswara Rao – Respondent


S. S. M. QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated April 26,1991 passed in I. A. No. 926 of 1985 in O. S. No. 67 of 1974 on the file of the Subordinate judge, Machilipatnam. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs in the said suit and the respondents are the defendants. Hereinafter, the parties will be referred as plaintiffs and defendants .

( 2 ) ON 19-7-1970 the parties entered into an agreement for sale of an extent of ac. 00. 90 cents situated in Pagolu village for a consideration of Rs. 12,150/ -. Under the said agreement, the plaintiffs were handed over possession of the said property. On 20th August, 1974, the plaintiffs filed the said suit for specific performance of the agreement of sale, which was decreed on 12-9-1977. The decree provided inter alia that the balance of sale consideration payable under the agreement for sale with interst at 12% per annum from 19-7-1970 to 20th july, 1977, be paid within three months from the date of decree and on deposit of the said consideration, after measuring the land in question, the plaintiffs would be entitled to have the sale deed executed and registered in their favour. The amount was de











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top