SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 188

P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
C. Anantha Kishan – Appellant
Versus
K. Ramesh Kumar – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) IN this revision petition, the second defendant in O. S. No. 1094/85 on the file of the IV Assistant Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad is challenging an order made in I. A. 62/92 dated 28-2-1992, whereunder, the application filed by him under Order 8, Rule 9 C. P. C. seeking amendment of the written statement was dismissed by the learned IV Assistant Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) THE respondent-plaintiff filed O. S. 1094/85 seeking specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 6-4-1973 executed by one C. Ramaswamy, the father of the petitioner, agreeing to sell 250 Sq. yards of site together with super structures bearing Municipal Nol-4-907/908 situated atbakaram, Hyderabad. As the said Ramaswamy did not co-operate in executing the sale deed, the suit was filed and as he died, pending the suit, his sons, the petitioner and his brother were brought on record as defendant Nos. 2 and 3. The evidence on the side of the respondent-plaintiff was closed as long back as on 31-7-1991 and since then, the matter was being dragged on some pretext or the other. The petitioner instead of getting ready with the evidence, filed an application on 30-











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top