M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE Writ Petitioner is a clerk working in and temple. He has come forward with this Writ Petition claiming that he is entitled to continue in service till he attains 65 years and he prayed for the relief of quashing the letter dated 24-4-1993 issued by the Executive Officer of the temple.

( 2 ) THE Advocate for the petitioner places reliance upon a Judgment of this court in Writ Petition No. 5752 dated 7-8-1974 pronounced by a Division Bench of this Courtin M. Satyanarayana Murthy vs. Executive Officer, Sri Rameswaraswamy temple, Achanta and another, and he contends that no rules were framed under Act no. 30 of 1987 regarding conditions of service and he tries to rely upon the rules issued in G. O. Ms. No. 1171, Endowments- I Department, dated 16th December, 1987 and claims that the age of superannuation for the clerk is 65 years and not 58 years, and hence the petitioner cannot be retired on his attaining the age of 58 years.

( 3 ) THE argument of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is totally misconceived. It is a true mat under the A. P. Charitable and Hindu Religious institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (in short Act No. 30 of 1987), no rules wer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document