SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 292

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY, P.L.N.SHARMA, A.LAKSHMANA RAO
L. Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. – Respondent


A. LAKSHMANA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in all these writ petitions are contractors who have undertaken to execute works of civil nature entrusted to them by the Singareni Collieries company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the respondent company )- The execution of the work is governed by he terms and conditions incorporated in a written agreement entered into by the respondent company with each one of the contractors. It is stated that till the year 1983 the respondent company was holding lease hold rights for the excavation of minor minerals such as building stone, lime-kankar, sand etc. , from specified quarries. The contractors have been using the minor minerals excavated from the quarries in respect of which, lease-hold rights have been granted in favour of the respondent company by the mines Department under the Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession rules, 1966, in the execution of the works entrusted to them. As regards the payment of seigniorage fee on the minor minerals excavated by the contractors, a specific clause in the form of Clause (8) had been incorporated in the agreement entered into by the respondent company with the contractors. Clause. 8: For metal, u



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top