SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 290

G.V.L.NARASIMHA RAO, M.N.RAO
Mangamma. (died) – Appellant
Versus
M. B. Subbaramappa Nayanimvaru – Respondent


( 1 ) THE Appellant is" the legal representative of the Ist defendant in the suit, O. S. No. 9 of 1974 on the file of the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Chittoor. The respondents are the plaintiffs in the suit. Their paternal grandfather was one Ramadasappa Nayanimvaru. Mangarnma, the 1st defendant in the suit was the permanent kept mistress of the said Ramadasappa Nayanimvaru. He also had two legally wedded wives. On 29-2-1932 Ramadasappa Nayanimvaru executed a gift deed (Ex. B-1) gifting away a double storeyed building known as Swarna Mahal in Chittoor town to Mangamma. Thereafter some time in the year 1937 Ramadasappa Nayanimvaru died. After his death Mangamma instituted a suit, O. S. No. 62 of 1937 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Chittoor against Sesha-chalapathi Rajulumgaru, the father of the plaintiffs seeking maintenance. That suit ended in a compromise (Ex. A-4 ). The said compromise decree has two schedules. Schedule A pertains to the main residential building, and schedule B refers to a part of that building and compound admeasuring 80 x30 . The plaint A and B schedules are identical to schedules A and B of the compromise decree, Ex. A-4. Und


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top