S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-Bank questions the order of the learned Additional Subordinate judge at Anantapur in LA. No. 436 of 1989 in i O. S. No. 28 of 1988 dated 4-11-1989 allowing the said I. A. and directing the petitioner "either to file true authenticated copy of entire minutes book or they should file original minutes book". That order was made in an application made under Order 11 Rule 14 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure code.

( 2 ) THE respondent herein filed the said O. S. No. 28 of 1988 against the petitioner herein for declaring that its order dated 27-8-1986 directing compulsory retirement of the respondent and the order dated 5-1-1987 of the appellate authority are illegal, void and inoperative and to direct the petitioner-Bank to reinstate the respondent in his post as divisional Manager of the Bank with all consequential benefits. It is stated in the affidavit of the respondent filed in support of the present application that by order dated 27-8-1986 of the working committee of the petitioner-Bank, the respondent was compulsorily retired from service and that his appeal against the said order was disposed of without hearing him on 5-1-1987.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document