SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 310

M.N.RAO, G.V.L.NARASIMHA RAO
M. N. Mohd. Mirza alias Mirza – Appellant
Versus
B. Subhan Saheb – Respondent


M. N. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS letters patent appeal is from the judgment of a learned single Judge in a. S. No. 1134 of 1987 dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant-defendant no. 1 against the judgment and decree in O. S. Ne. 55 of 1981 on the file of the court of the Subordinate Judge, Adoni, decreeing the suit of the respondent- plaintiff for specific performance of an agreement of sale (Ex. A-1) dt. 28-4-1981 in respect of the house bearing No. 601 of Ward. No. 18 in Adoni town. Defendants 2 to 11 in the suit are either sisters or legal representatives of the sisters of the first defendant, the owner of the suit house and the learned counsel for the appellant rightly says that they are not necessary parties to this appeal.

( 2 ) THE appellant-defendant is the owner of the suit house. It is recited in ex. A-1 that the sale consideration is Rs. 28,100/-, out of which, Rs. 5,000/- was taken towards advance by the appellant and the balance consideration should be paid by the respondent-plaintiff before 29-5-1981 for entitlement for registration and failure to get the sale deed registered by that date would entail forfeiture of the deposit and cancellation of the agreement. The a
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top