SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 378

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, M.N.RAO
Abdul Latif Sahib – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Dastagir Sahib – Respondent


M. N. RAO J.

( 1 ). THIS letters patent appeal by defendants 1 to 18 in the suit is from the judgment of a learned single Judge in A. S. No. 475 of 1977 granting a preliminary decree in favour of the first plaintiff (respondent No. 1 herein) setting aside the judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Chirala in O. S. No. 48 of 1971 dismissing the suit.

( 2 ) RESPONDENTS 1 and 2 herein instituted the suit - O. S. No. 48 of 1971 - claiming 1/18th share in the suit properties as successors of their father - mohammed Kasim - and in addition, the first plaintiff (respondent No. l) also claimed 1/3rd share in the suit properties on the basis of a gift deed, Ex. A-1, dated 19-12-1938 executed by one Chettabi. In other words, they claimed division of the plaint schedule properties admeasuring Ac. 80-54 cents into 18 shares and allotment of seven shares to them. The suit properties are situate in ramanayapalem village, near Cherukuru, Chirala taluk, Ongole District.

( 3 ) IN Fasli 1221 (1812), one Raja Venkata Krishna Rao granted an inam comprising the suit properties in favour of one of the ancestors of the parties to the suit. In the Inam fair Register, Ex. B-2, it is mentioned in cloumn































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top