SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 435

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY
Katta Yesuratnam – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Land Revenue, A. P. , Hyderabad – Respondent


B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition questions the order of cancellation of assignment of land made in favour of Turka Chennaiah. Turka Chennaiah was assigned with a land of Ac. 1-93 cents in S. No. 492/7 of Gorentla village. The assignment was made in the year 1974. The dispute regarding the agreement to share the profits is not at all relevant. Suffice it to say that assignment was ordered in the name of T. Chennaiah and patta was issued consequent thereto. The assignment was granted under B. S. O. 15 (12) (3 ). The conditions enumerated are that the assignment is heritable but not alienable, that the land should be brought under cultivation within three years thereof and that the assignee and his family members alone shall be in possession of the same. Initially the order of cancellation was made. Against that order an appeal was preferred. The Appellate authority remanded the matter for fresh disposal to the primary authority. The primary authority confirmed the order. Against that order an appeal was filed before the appellate authority and the appellate authority again remanded the matter to the primary authority. The primary authority again confirmed the order of c





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top