G. RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE first plaintiff is the wife of the defendant. Plaintiff No. 2 is the son of the defendant and plaintiff No. 1. Plaintiff No. 1 filed a suit for maintenance, past and future, for herself and also for her minor son at the rate of Rs. 500/- and Rs. 200/- respectively and also for return of the jewellery. It is stated the jewellery consists of 15 soverign of gold in two items - three bangles and one chandraharam, and with regard to silver jewellery it consists of silver items of 300 tolas. The marriage between plaintiff No. 1 and the defendant took place on 18-11-1983. From 304-1984 they were living separately. By that time plaintiff No. 1 was pregnant. She gave birth to a male child on 26-8-1984. The husband sent a lawyer s notice on 10-8-1984 followed by a reply. Thereafter, he filed O. P. No. 235 of 1985 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights. The present suit was subsequent to O. P. No. 235 of 1985. Subsequently the defendant, with the permission of the Court, withdrew the application filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and filed an application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act which is numb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document