SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 467

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO, P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
VENKATESWARA, K. V. SUDARSANA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. , REP. , BY ITS SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD – Respondent


P. RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, J.

( 1 ) 1. C. M. A. No. 1532 of 1992:- this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the decree and judgment in o. S. NO. 1 of 1992 dated September 22,1992 on the file of the District Judge s court, Karimnagar.

( 2 ) THE appellant filed originally - O. S. No. 93 of 1991 on the file of the subordinate Judge s Court, Karimnagar which was transferred and renumbered as O. S. No. 1 of 1992 on the file of the District Judge s Court, Karimnagar. The suit was filed under Sections 8, 20 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, to direct the defendants to file the arbitration agreement dated 30-12-1988; and to appoint one of the persons from the panel of arbitrators submitted by him as arbitrator and for other reliefs. As the suit was dismissed, the plaintiff filed this appeal. C. M. A. No. 1533 of 1992:-

( 3 ) THIS Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the decree and judgment passed in O. S. No. 2 of 1992 on the file of the District Judge s Court karimnagar (O. S. No. 94 of 1991 on the file of the Subordinate Judge s Court, karimnagar), filed under Sections 8 and 20 of the Arbitration Act, to direct the defendants to file the agreement dated 4-1-1988 and for appoint





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top