SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 530

V.SIVARAMAN NAIR, S.V.MARUTHI
Advocate-General, A. P. , Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar, Inspector of Police, Mir Chowk Police Station, Hyderabad – Respondent


V. SIVARAMAN NAIR, J.

( 1 ) SUO motu proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act were initiated against the respondent contemner on the allegation that the contemner forced an Advocate-Commissioner appointed by the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad to make an entry in the General Diary of the Police Station to the effect that he did not find Mohammed Ayub who was arrested on 9-3-1990 in the police lock-up.

( 2 ) ONE Sri Ahamad Hussain had filed Criminal M. P. No. 396/90 under Section 97 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the Court of the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. By order dated 12-3-1990, the Magistrate appointed Sri V. Balraj, Advocate as Commissioner to search the premises of Sanjeevareddy Nagar Police Station or any other Police Station in the twin cities, and if he found Mohammed Ayub, to produce him before the Court on 16-3-1990. On 13-3-1990, the petitioner Ahammed Hussain filed a memo in Criminal M. P. No. 396/90 alleging that the Inspector of Police, Mir Chowk Police Station - Mr. Ashok Kumar, respondent herein, had obstructed the Commissioner - Sri Balraj from entering the lock-up of that Station and in the meantime, the Police Constable had shifted Mohammed A








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top