V.SIVARAMAN NAIR, S.V.MARUTHI
Advocate-General, A. P. , Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar, Inspector of Police, Mir Chowk Police Station, Hyderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) SUO motu proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act were initiated against the respondent contemner on the allegation that the contemner forced an Advocate-Commissioner appointed by the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad to make an entry in the General Diary of the Police Station to the effect that he did not find Mohammed Ayub who was arrested on 9-3-1990 in the police lock-up.
( 2 ) ONE Sri Ahamad Hussain had filed Criminal M. P. No. 396/90 under Section 97 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the Court of the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. By order dated 12-3-1990, the Magistrate appointed Sri V. Balraj, Advocate as Commissioner to search the premises of Sanjeevareddy Nagar Police Station or any other Police Station in the twin cities, and if he found Mohammed Ayub, to produce him before the Court on 16-3-1990. On 13-3-1990, the petitioner Ahammed Hussain filed a memo in Criminal M. P. No. 396/90 alleging that the Inspector of Police, Mir Chowk Police Station - Mr. Ashok Kumar, respondent herein, had obstructed the Commissioner - Sri Balraj from entering the lock-up of that Station and in the meantime, the Police Constable had shifted Mohammed A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.