IMMANENI PANDURANGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision filed petition is filed by the plaintiff. He a suit for a declaration that the period of lease is three years commencing from 19-8-1987 and for consequential injunction.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of the suit, in brief, are as follows.

( 3 ) IN the Vaikuntam Queue Complex in Tirumala, the petitioner was granted a licence to cater to the needs of the pilgrims by supplying food stuffs to them while they are waiting in the queue on a monthly rent of Rs. 21,000 for a period of three years from 19-8-1987 to 18-8-1990. According to the revision petitioner, what has been granted in his favour is a lease but not licence.

( 4 ) THE grievence of the petitioner is that the Executive Officer, Tirumala tirupathi Devasthanams has issued a lease as per Ex. A-1 in pursuance of the board s resolution whereas the Deputy Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi devasthanams, Tirupathi without giving any notice has issued Ex. A-2 notice reducing the term of lease from three years to one year which is illegal. In the suit filed by him in O. S. No. 182 of 1988 on the file of the Additional Subordinate judge s Court, Tirupathi, the learned Subordinat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document