Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, SARDAR ALI KHAN
Rana Ratna Rao - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 01-23-92
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL - JURISDICTION - APPOINTMENT OF VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS - ANDHRA PRADESH VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS SERVICE RULES, 1990 - WHETHER HIGH COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN WRIT PETITIONS CHALLENGING APPOINTMENTS MADE UNDER THE RULES - HELD, NO - JURISDICTION VESTED WITH ANDHRA PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 15 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985.
Fact of the Case:
Writ petitions were filed challenging the appointments made to the posts of Village Administrative Officers under the Andhra Pradesh Village Administrative Officers Service Rules, 1990. The State Government raised a preliminary objection that the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the matter under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the writ petitions. The Court noted that the Andhra Pradesh Village Administrative Officers Service Rules, 1990 were framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India for regulating the recruitment and conditions of service of Village Administrative Officers, which were civil posts. The Court further noted that Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 vested jurisdiction over matters concerning recruitment to any civil service of the State or to any civil post under the State in the Administrative Tribunal.
Issues: 1. Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to entertain writ petitions challenging appointments made under the Andhra Pradesh Village Administrative Officers Service Rules, 1990? 2. Whether the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the matter under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The High Court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the writ petitions because the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the matter under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. 2. Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 vested jurisdiction over matters concerning recruitment to any civil service of the State or to any civil post under the State in the Administrative Tribunal.
Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the writ petitions as not maintainable on the question of jurisdiction.
( 1 ) THIS batch of writ petitions has been filed for issue of appropriate writs relating to appointment to posts of Village Administrative Officers under the andhra Pradesh Village Administrative Officers Service Rules, 1990.
( 2 ) WHEN the matter came up before the learned single judge, a preliminary objection was raised with regard to jurisdiction of the High Court to entertain the writ petitions on the ground that it is the Andhra Pradesh Administrative tribunal which has jurisdiction to deal with the matter and not the High Court. The learned single Judge has thus made an order of reference of the cases to division Bench stating that the Rules referred to above have been framed under article 309 of the Constitution of India, and the contention raised on behalf of the State Government that the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal alone has got jurisdiction under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 to deal with the matter becomes an important question of law which requires to be decided by a Division Bench of this Court.
( 3 ) WE have heard the matter in considerable detail mainly with regard to the question of jurisdiction. It may be noticed that the Andhra Pradesh Village administrative Officers Service Rules, 1990 ha ve been framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India for regulating recruitment and conditions of service of Village Administrative Officers. It is also to be noted that these Rules have been framed for appointment of Village Administrative Officer which is undoubtedly a "civil post". The contention of the writ petitioners is that, this matter can be decided by the High Court in exercise of its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India inasmuch as the writ petitioners in all these cases are erstwhile Village Officers who are to be absorbed as Village Administrative officers under the said Rules. We do not find any force in this contention because, under Rule 3 of the said Rules what is visualised is, appointment of village Administrative Officer for every village or for a group of villages as the government or Commissioner of Land Revenue or the District Collector may, from time to time, consider necessary. The appointing authority for these posts shall be the Revenue Divisional Officer. Therefore, it will be a misnomer to say that it is a question of absorption of erstwhile Village Officers as Village administrative Officers and not appointment as such.
( 4 ) THE other ground of attack of the writ petitioners in this case is with regard to certain qualifications prescribed for appointment as Village Administrative officers. For example, it is provided under Rule 8 (1) (i) of the Rules that a person who applies for appointment as Village Administrative Officer should have passed 7th Class or its equivalent examination.
( 5 ) THESE are all matters which could be considered if we come to the conclusion that the High Court has jurisdiction to deal with such matters. More over, this is a question of appointment to a "civil post" by an authority which is known as "civil authority". In matters of this nature, Section 15 of the administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 deserves consideration. To the extent relevant. Section 15 of the said Act provides: "15. Jurisdiction. Powers and Authority of State Administrative tribunals:- (1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, the Administrative tribunal for a State shall exercise, on and from the appointed day, all the jurisdiction, powers and authority exercisable immediately before that day by all courts except the Supreme Court in relation to - (a) recruitment, and matters concerning recruitment, to any civil service of the State or to any civil post under the State; (b) all service matters concerning a person not being a person referred to in clause (c) of this sub-section or a member, person or civilian referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 14 appointed to any civil service of the State
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.