SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 50

V.NEELADRI RAO
Maqbool Khan – Appellant
Versus
Shabjadi Khatoon – Respondent


V. NEELADRI RAO, J.

( 1 ) D-2 and D-3 in O. S. No. 1981 of 1982 on the file of the VIII Assistant judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad are the revision petitioners, R. 1 herein filed the suit for partition of the house hearing No. 17. 2. 582 admeasuring 550 sq. yards situated at Kurmaguda, Saidabad. Preliminary decree was passed for partition and R. 1 plaintiff is entitled to 1/13th and D-2 and D-3 are entitled to 2/13th each and six others are entitled to 1/13th each and the l. Rs. of the deceased defendant are entitled to 2/13th. It is a case of division of the property amongst brothers and sisters and each of the 3 brothers is given 2/13th share while each of the sisters is given 1/13th share.

( 2 ) R. 1 (Plaintiff) filed I. A. No. 481 of 1987 for passing the final decree after partition of the plaint schedule house.

( 3 ) ADVOCATE Commissioner submitted that the suit house cannot be conveniently and reasonably divided in accordance with the preliminary decree. Then the revision petitioners who are residing in the plaint schedule house, filed I. A. No. 224 of 1991 praying that the plaint schedule house may be allotted to them and they are prepared to pay the compensation to the oth















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top