SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 45

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO, IYYAPU PANDURANGA RAO
Sub-Collector and Land Acquisition Officer – Appellant
Versus
N. Mahaboob Saheb – Respondent


( 1 ) A. S. No. 216 of 1982 is filed by the State Government against O. P. No. 15 of 1979 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Kurnool, Different claimants have filed different appeals against the same judgment contending that the compensation granted by the District Judge is too low.

( 2 ) TWO separate Notifications under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act ( the Act for brevity) have issued for acquisition of land measuring about Ac. 33. 12 cents and Ac. 88 cents situate at Moolasagaram village within the Municipal limits of Nandyal town for the purpose of Sreenivasanagar Co-operative House Building Society at Nandyal, on a requisition made by the said Society on 26-10-1971. Possession of the entire land covered by the two Notifications was taken on 13-1-1975. The Land Acquisition Officer, Nandyal, by his award dated 10-10-1975 granted uniform compensation at Rs. 13,000. 00 per acre. Dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, some of the land owners requested him to refer the matter to the Civil Court under Section 18 of the Act, claiming compensation at Rs. l,500. 00 per a cent. Some have claimed at Rs. 4,000. 00 per a c
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top