SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 39

S.S.M.QUADRI, M.RANGA REDDY
Morasa Anjaiah – Appellant
Versus
Kondragunta Venkateswarlu (died) – Respondent


RAMANUJULU NAIDU, J.

( 1 ) SRI Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the lower Court committed an error in impleading the petitioner as a party to the suit under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff having failed to implead her as the legal representative of the deceased 14th defendant by following the procedure prescribed under Order 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is also brought to my notice that the lower Court committed another error in observing that the plaintiff had no notice of the death of the 14th defendant. A certified copy of the memo filed by the advocate appearing for the l4th defendant in the lower court reads that the death of the 14th defendant in the suit on 9-9-1985 was notified to the advocate for the plaintiff in the lower court on 28-11-1985. It, therefore, follows that the plaintiff had notice of the death of the 14th defendant before expiry of the period-prescribed under Order 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure for making an application to set aside the abatement. The specific provisions contained in order 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure Were not resorted to. Instead on 3-7-1986 the plainti




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top