SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 136

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO
Vadla Balaiah – Appellant
Versus
K. Raghavender Reddy – Respondent


G. RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE interesting point that arises in this revision petition is whether paper publication can be issued when it is brought to the notice of the Court that in spite of sending notices either by registered post or acknowledgement due service could not be effected.

( 2 ) SRI Ella Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no procedure prescribed either under the Criminal Procedure Code or Criminal Rules of Practice with regard to publication of notices in newspaper.

( 3 ) ON 27-8-1990 my learned brother Bhaskar Rao, J. passed following order :"the petitioner s counsel is permitted to send the notices by registered post with acknowledgement due Post after two weeks". That order not having been complied with, the matter was posted before my learned brother N. D. Patnaik, J. on 9-4-91, who directed thus :"the learned counsel for the petitioner represents that though he sent notice by registered post, he is not having the acknowledgement with him now. The petitioner is directed to take notice to the respondents both through Court and also by registered post Ack. due within two weeks". Again, on a petition filed by the revision petitioner, C







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top