SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 192

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO
L. Prathap Reddy – Appellant
Versus
High Court of A. P. – Respondent


G. RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition is filed for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to revise and review the promotions given to the respondents 3 and 4 dt. 23-2-1988 and 12-5-1988 respectively and consequently promote the petitioner by revising his promotion as Deputy Nazir with effect from the date on which the respondents 3 and 4 were promoted and further by holding that the petitioner is senior to the respondents 3 and 4 in the category of Deputy Nazir/u. D. C.

( 2 ) THE promotion vacancies in Nizamabad unit (Judicial Department) arose in or about 1986. The respondents 3 and 4 herein filed writ petitions to fill up the vacancies by promotion and a direction was given to consider their cases for promotion. In pursuance of the direction given by this Court, the respondents 3 and 4 were considered for promotion and in view of that the writ petitions 16252 and 16885 of 1987 were disposed of by this Court stating that no further orders are necessary as the case of respondents 3 and 4 for promotion has been considered. The contention of the petitioner is that the respondents 3 and 4 were promoted subsequent to the petitioner acquired the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top