SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 190

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : S.C.PRATAP, SUBHASHAN REDDY
P.Ramnarayana - Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Panchayat Raj, Rural Development cum-Election Authority - Respondent
Decided On : 03-24-92

Withholding of elections based on a proposed merger with another local authority is not justified, and the democratic process should not be scuttled.

Headnote:

Writ of Certiorari - Gram Panchayat Elections - Withholding of Elections

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a Writ of Certiorari to quash the proceedings withholding the Gram Panchayat elections due to a proposed merger with a municipality, which was later quashed by the court.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no power vested in the respondents to withhold the elections and that the democratic process should not be scuttled. The court directed the respondents to hold the elections to the Gram Panchayat, while also allowing the authorities to delete a portion of the Gram Panchayat or the entire Gram Panchayat by issuing an appropriate notification and merge it with another local authority.

Issues: Withholding of Gram Panchayat elections due to proposed merger with a municipality.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there was no legal basis to withhold the elections based on the proposed merger with another local authority. It emphasized that even if the area was to be merged with another local authority, the elections need not be postponed or withheld.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with the court directing the respondents to hold elections to the Gram Panchayat and allowing the authorities to take action to delete a portion of the Gram Panchayat or the entire Gram Panchayat and merge it with another local authority.

B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the proceedings dated 20-2-88 issued by the first respondent in his proceedings wm No. 2420/election-I/88, withholding the elections. The petitioner is a resident of Khanapuram Haveli Gram panchayat of Khammam Urban Mandal of Khammam District. Ordinary elections to the Gram Panchayat were scheduled during the year 1988. But on tke ground that the area covered by the Gram panchayat mentioned supra was to be merged in Khammam Municipality, Gram panchayat elections, be that of Sarpanch or Committee thereof, were withheld under the impugned proceedings issued by the first respondent. It is not in dispute that the merger proposals were quashed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 5025 of 1988. As yet no fresh proposals were initiated as contained under Section 3 (2) of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat act, 1964. No notification is also placed before us merging the area of the instant gram Panchayat into that of Khammam municipality.

( 2 ) IN the circumstances, absolutely there is no power vested in the respondents to withhold the elections and the democratic process scuttled in this fashion. No election can be withheld on the ground that part of the area of the gram Panchayat is to be deleted and to be merged with other local authority. The position of law is so clear that even if the elections are held and even if the elected body of the Gram Panchayat is subsisting, nothing prevents the authorities concerned, be it under the Andhra pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 or the Andhra Pradesh Municipality Act, to delete a particular area from the Gram panchayat, or to renotify the entire Gram panchayat and merge that particular area or the entire area of the Gram Panchayat with any other local authority, like khammarn Municipality in the instant case. For that reason the elections need not be postponed or withheld.

( 3 ) IN the circumstances, we issue directions to respondents to hold elections to Khanapuram Haveli Gram Panchayat. However, we also make it clear that this order of ours does not preclude the authorities concerned from acting in the direction to delete a partion of the gram Panchayat or the entire Gram Panchayat by issuing an appropriate notification, after affording opportunity and then to merge with other local authority, be it khammam Municipality or otherwise.

( 4 ) THE writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Advocate s fee rs. 300/ -.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top