SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 187

A.GOPAL RAO
S. Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Super Hotel, Lodging and Boarding, Hyderabad – Respondent


A. GOPAL RAO, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS in this revision petition are third-parties, who sought to be impleaded as party-defendants in the suit O. S. 5244/1991, on the file of the ix Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. 2. The facts, necessary for disposal of this revision petition, in brief, are as follows: petitioners are the owners of the suit schedule property, viz. , the building bearing municipal No. 5-8-263 and 264 situated at Public Garden Road, nampally, Hyderabad. The 1st respondent is the tenant and the 2nd respondent is the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, who is the sole defendant in the suit. Petitioners have obtained an order of eviction against the 1st respondent on 27-3-1986 in R. C. 404/76 on the file of the Principal rent Controller, Hyderabad and the appeal, R. A. 182/86, filed by the 1st respondent against the order in R. C. 404/76, on the file of the Additional chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, is pending. The 1st respondent filed the present suit O. S. 5244/91, seeking for the relief of declaration that rejecting the licence to run business (hotel) by the defendant (second respondent herein) is illegal and void and directing the defendant













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top