SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 270

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO, IYYAPU PANDURANGA RAO
Laxama Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


LYYAPU PANDURANGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision petition is directed against the order dated July 9,1991 of the chairman, L. R. A. T. Sangareddy, rejecting the revision petitioners claim to correct the alleged clerical mistakes and determine the Standard Holding of each of the declarants in the interest of equity.

( 2 ) THIS matter originally came upto before A. Lakshmana Rao, J. , while he was sitting single. Before the learned single Judge the decisions reported in A. Reddy Yerrayyamma vs. Authorised Officer, K. Rama Rao vs. State of Andhra pradesh and Chenchi Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh were cited to impress upon the learned Judge that the point involved is nothing but a pure and simple clerical mistake and the same has to be corrected as prayed for. The learned judge having heard the matter observed as follows:"in the instant case, after the order of the Land Reforms Tribunal had become final, the declarants filed a petition under Rule 16 (5) (b) for rectification of the mistake in the computation of their holdings. The primary Tribunal as well as the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the petition holding that the alleged mistake in the computation of the holding was not raised


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top