SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 240

G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO, IYYAPU PANDURANGA RAO
Revenue Divisional Officer – Appellant
Versus
Raja J. Rameswara Rao – Respondent


G. RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) AS these three appeals arise out of a common order dated 25-4-1986 in o. P. No. 16/84 on the file of the Subordinate Judge at Gadwal, all of them are being disposed of together.

( 2 ) AN extent of Ac. 3. 36guntasof dry land covered by S. No. 1142 in Wanaparthy village in Mahaboobnagar District was acquired by means of a notification dated 8-3-1979 under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act for the purpose of construction of an R. T. C. bus-stand. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an award on 19-6-1981 fixing me market value at Rs. 1-60 paise per square yard. On reference, the civil court passed an order on 25-4-1986 fixing the market value at Rs. 50/- per square yard. Aggrieved by the said award the claimants as well the beneficiary i. e. , the A. P. S. R. T. C. preferred these appeals.

( 3 ) THE Land Acquisition Officer considering the potential items and particularly relying upon Exs. A-14 and A-15 sale deeds, awarded a sum of rs. 1-60 Ps. per square yard towards compensation. On reference, in the Civil court, the claimants claimed compensation at the rate of Rs. 100/- per square yard. As many as 15 documents were marked on behalf of the claim









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top