SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 352

A.LAKSHMANA RAO, D.JAGANNADHA RAJU, R.RAMAKRISHNA
LOKAYUKTA FOR A. P. , HYDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
B. SESHADRI – Respondent


D. J. JAGANNADHA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THESE two writ appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 16th october, 1987, in writ petitions W. P. No. 3555 of 1986 and W. P. No. 4753 of 1986. W. P. No. 3555 of 1986 was filed questioning the proposal to conduct an investigation by the Lokayukta into Complaint No. 871 of 1986 regarding three allegations. W. P. No. 4753 of 1986 was filed questioning the proceedings of the lokayukta in Dis. No. 4144 dated 15-4-1986 initiating an investigation on his own motion. The learned single judge allowed the two writ petitions and quashed the proceedings impugned in the two writ petitions.

( 2 ) THE present respondent Dr. B. Seshadri was working as the Principal and superintendent of the Government Dental College/hospital, Hyderabad. A student by name C. Sekhar gave a complaint to the Lokayukta. Subsequently the complainant did not support the allegations in the complaint and when an opportunity was given to him to fulfil the formalities of a complaint under the andhra Pradesh Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayukta Act, 1983, (hereinafter called the Act ), he failed to do it. The learned Lokayukta did not dismiss the complaint in limine though Section 9 of the Act





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top