( 1 ) THIS Revision is directed against the orders of the First Additional Rent controller, Hyderabad in E. P. No. 44/89 in R. CNo. 1041/ 1988.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the filing of this revision can briefly be stated as follows: The Petitioner was the tenant of the Respondent in respect of premises situated at Hyderabad. The Respondent-land-lady filed R. CNo. 1041/88 for eviction of the petitioner on the ground that she required the premises for demolition and re-construction. In these proceedings the parties entered into a compromise and filed a compromise Memo on 28-12-1988. As per mat compromise, the Petitioner-tenant shall deliver possession of the premises to the land-lady on 28-12-1988 and the land-lady agreed to complete construction and redeliver possession of the reconstructed premises within six months from 28-12-1988 to the Tenant. The Rent Controller accordingly allowed the Petition. The Respondents took possession of the premises, completed re-construction of the same but did not redeliver possession of the premises to the Petitioner after its completion. So the petitioner gave a notice dated 3-7-1989 to the Respondent- landlady and requested