SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 378

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Andhra Printers Limited, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) A preliminary objection raised by the Management of M/s. Andhra Printers Limited with regard to the maintainability of the application under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the I. D. Act ) filed by a journalist has led to the filing of this writ petition by the Management. The Labour Court over-ruled the preliminary objection and held that Section 17 of the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as w. J. Act ) does not bar a claim under Section 33-C (2) of the I. D. Act made by a working journalist.

( 2 ) THE 2nd respondent in the writ petition was the applicant before the Labour Court. He was a part-time Correspondent of Andhra Jyothi daily newspaper at Warangal. The 2nd respondent who was being paid a consolidated salary had claimed before the Labour Court scales of pay, Dearness Allowance, House Rent Allowance, Variable Dearness Allowance, Bonus and wages in lieu of earned leave, for the period between 1975 and 1986. The Management (petitioner herein) apart from denying entitlement of the petitioner to the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top