SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 433

I.P.RAO
Nizamabad Corn Products (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vasudev Dalia – Respondent


IMMANENI PANDURANGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal preferred by the defendants aggrieved by the order of temporary injunction restraining them from giving effect to the resolutions passed at the 4th Annual General Meeting and the Board Meeting held on 30-4-1992 removing the respondent-plaintiff from the director-ship of the 1st defendant company.

( 2 ) THE suit is filed for a declaration that the resolutions removing the respondent-plaintiff as a director of the 1st defendant company and the other resolutions passed in the 4th Annual General Meeting and the Board of directors meeting held on 30-4-92 are illegal and void and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the rights of the plamtiff as a director of the first defendant-company and other reliefs.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the appellants argued that the Company was incorporated in November 1987; that the plaintiff was one of the Directors of the company; that by reason of his being absent for five consecutive meetings of the board of Directors by virtue of Section 283 (l) (g) of the Companies Act (hereinafter referred to as an act ) the office of the Director has fallen vacant and by me










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top