A.VENKATARAMI REDDY
Racharla Ramarao – Appellant
Versus
V. Venkateswarulu – Respondent
( 1 ) THE defendant in the suit O. S. No. 123 of 1987 on the file of the II Additional subordinate Judge, Warangal is the petitioner in this C. R. P.
( 2 ) AN ex parte decree was passed on 24-7-89. On coming to know of theex parte decree the petitioner herein filed I. A. No. 618/89 under Or. 9, Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the ex parte decree. The said application was dismissed by the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Warangal. Aggrieved by the same the defendant-petitioner herein preferred an appeal C. M. A. No. 22/90 to the additional District Judge, Warangal. The lower appellate court found that the suit summons were not served on the defendant. It therefore set aside the ex parte decree passed against the defendant, but imposed a condition mat the defendant shall deposit the costs of Rs. 2,705/- and also a sum of Rs. 15,000/- towards suit amount on or before 3-12-90. Aggrieved by the imposition of the condition of depositing Rs. 15,000/- only, the above C. R. P. is filed.
( 3 ) IT is submitted by Mr. V. S. R. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner that as the lower appellate court was satisfied mat the suit summons were not served, it is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.