V. NEELADRI RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff in O. S. No. 90/89 on the file of the District Munsif, Pithapuram, is the Revision Petitioner. The suit was filed for an injunction against respondents 2 to 6 herein restraining them from intertering with the -possession of the plaint- schedule property by alleging that he had taken the plaint schedule land on lease from the 1st Respondent herein and that R-2, to R-6 here in have no manner of interest in the property. R-l herein filed I. A. No. 755 / 89 under Qrder-I, Rule 10, C. P. C with a prayer that it should be allowed to Come on record to contest the suit. The said petition was allowed and it is attacked in this revision petition.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY R-l herein is the owner of the plaint-schedule property. R-l, temple had filed eviction petition as against the revision petitioner herein. The eviction was ordered and the same was confirmed by the appellate court the revision petitioner herein filed W. P. No. 9536 / 87 for issual of a direction as againt R-l temple herein restraining them from dispossessing him from the land as he has a right u/s. 82 (2) of the A. P. Charitable and Hindu Religious institutions and Endowments Act (for short th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document