SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 385

MOTILAL B.NAIK
NALAMATI LATCHANNA – Appellant
Versus
MASINA SRIRAMULU – Respondent


MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) RESPONDENT herein is the Plaintiff is O. S. Nos. 464/83 and 372/88 on the file of the Principalsubordinate Judge s Court,kakinada. Originally, the respondent filed O. S. No. 178/83 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif s Court, kakinada for declaration of his fishing rights in Chintalacheruvu and consequently to restrain the defendants therein from interfering with the said rights. A temporary injunction was also obtained by the respondent-plaintiff restraining the defendants therein from obstructing him from catching fish. It is under the background that the defendants therein have obstructed the plaintiff from catching fish and thereby caused damages to the tune of rs. 60,000/-, the respondent-Plaintiff filed O. S. No. 464/83 before the Principal subordinate Judge s Court, Kakinadaagainst the defendants therein for recovery of the said damages. Later on, he filed O. P. No. 174 /88 before the III Additional district Judge, Kakinada for transferringo. S. No. 178/83 to the Court of Principal subordinate Judge, Kakinada where O. S. No. 464/83 was pending and sought indulgence of the Court for trying the suits together. Pursuant to the transfer order









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top