SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 442

M.RANGA REDDY
G. Murali Krishna – Appellant
Versus
P. Mahalakshmi – Respondent


M. RANGA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed by the tenants against the orders of the subordinate Judge, Rajahmundry in R. C. A. No. 10 / 88 reversing the order of the rent Controller in R. C. C. No. 29/81 and directing eviction of the petitioners- tenants on the ground of wilful default.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the filing of this revision are in brief as follows: For purpose of convenience, I would refer to the parties as they are arrayed in the application for eviction. The petitioner in R. C. C. No. 29 / 81 is the owner of a non-residential building bearing No. 6/370 New D. No. 9-21-10 situated at rajahmundry. The respondents took the premises on a monthly rent of rs. 300/ -. Rent was payable on first of every succeeding month. The tenancy commenced on 10-10-1980. The respondents committed wilful default in payment of rent for the months of January and February 1981. It is further contended that the respondents also failed to pay a sum of Rs. 30/- from out of the rent payable from 18-10-1980 to 31-10-1980. Hence, she filed the petition for eviction.

( 3 ) THE respondents filed a counter stating that the petitioner-landlady had a son by name Padmarao and that th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top