SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 538

IYYAPU PANDURANGA RAO
G. M. Jeelani – Appellant
Versus
Shanswar Kulsum – Respondent


IYYAPU PANDURANGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE present revision came to be filed under the following circumstances. The revision petitioner is one Sri G. M. Jeelani, hereinafter referred to as the husband. The first respondent in the revision petition is the wife and the second respondent is the daughter of the revision petitioner. They will be hereinafter referred to as the wife and minor daughter. The first respondent was married to the petitioner at Mandapeta as per Muslim rights on 5-5-1975. For some time they lived together resulting in the birth of the second respondent. It appears that subsequently differences arose between the parties resulting in the husband divorcing the wife by saying irrevocable Talaq on 2-7-1980. Subsequently the wife filed M. C. No. 45 of 1980 on the file of the learned II Additional J. F. C. M. Kakinada, under section 125 Crl. P. C. for maintenance for self and for her minor daughter. Having heard the matter, the learned II Addl. J. F. C. M. awarded maintenance at Rs. 300. 00 and Rs. 50. 00 respectively to the wife and minor daughter. Aggrieved by the same the husband filed Crl. R. P. No. 7 of 1992 on the file of the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry. The lea












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top