B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal raises an important point for consideration with regard to maintainability of an appeal directly before the Government under Section 89 of the Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 (for short "the Act") against an order passed by an officer or authority other than the Director.

( 2 ) THE lis arose interse two lady lecturers, the writ petitioner-appellant here in and the 3rd respondent, with regard to their continuance of service in the college of the 2nd respondent. The appellant was appointed as Junior Lecturer, while the 3rd respondent was appointed as a lecturer. It is stated that there was no post of Junior Lecturer and as such, the appellant was later on treated as a lecturer. The 3rd respondent was appointed as a lecturer temporarily during the leave period of one Mr. P. Sudarshan. Since the said Sudarshan returned and resumed the. post, the services of the 3rd respondent were terminated by order dated 30-9-1983. The writ petitioner-appellant was appointed in the post held by Mr. E. Ganga Reddy, who firstly went on deputation and later resigned. But, nevertheless, her appointment was also temporary. Permanent appointments were to be m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document