SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 673

A.VENKATARAMI REDDY, P.L.N.SHARMA
K. Kara Gopal – Appellant
Versus
K. Venkata Ratna Kumar – Respondent


P. L. N. SARMA, J.

( 1 ) THESE references have been made by the IIIrd Additional District Judge, visakhapatnam under Section 113 read with Order 46, Rule 1 of the Code of civil Procedure on an objection raised by the respondents before him in the appeals regarding the competency of the said Court to entertain the appeals whose value is less than Rs. 30,000/- arising out ot suits instituted prior to the passing of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1984 (Act 19 of 1984), hereinafter referred to as the Act 19 of 1984 .

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are as follows:

( 3 ) RESPONDENTS in the appeals before the learned Illrd Additional District judge, Visakhapatnam were the plaintiffs. Defendants in the respective suits filed the appeals before the IIIrd Additional District Judge.

( 4 ) AS the facts are identical in both the matters, we will take up R. C. (SR) no. 26223 of 1991.

( 5 ) PLAINTIFFS therein filed the suit O. S. No. 197 of 1983 on the file of IInd additional Sub-Court, Visakhapatnam for declaration of title and for recovery of possession, profits etc. The suit was valued at Rs. 22,950/- and the same was instituted on 23-4-1983. Pending the said suit, Andhra Pradesh C












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top