SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 637

S.V.MARUTHI
Kannegolla Naghabhushanam – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent


S. V. MARUTHI, J.

( 1 ) THE claimant in O. P. No. 56/85 on the file of the Subordinate Judge s Court, Eluru is the petitioner in this revision. He filed this revision aggrieved by the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Eluru in I. A. No. 226 of 1990 in O. P. No. 56 of 1985 dated 10-3-1992 holding that the review petition filed by the petitioner for review and modification of the judgment passed in O. P. No. 56 of 1985 dated 29-10-90, is not maintainable.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as follows : The Government acquired Ac. 3. 80 cents of land belonging to the petitioner in R. S. No. 779 in Block No. II of Eluru town for providing house sites for the weaker sections. A notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published on 6-12-1983. The Land Acquisition Officer (L. A. O.) passed the award No. 1/84-85 on 31-10-1984 fixing the market value of the land at Rs. 48,400. 00 per acre. On a reference made under Section 18 of the L. A. Act to the Civil Court, at the instance of the petitioner, the matter was numbered as O. P. No. 56/85 on the file of the Subordinate Judge s Court, Eluru. The learned Subordinate Judge relying upon the basic value certificate dated 1



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top