SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 35

V.NEELADRI RAO
N. Chenchuramaiah – Appellant
Versus
Syed Nawabjan – Respondent


V. NEELADRI RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE tenant who is the respondent in R. C. 2/76 on the file of Rent controller (Principal District Munsif, Nellore) is the revision petitioner. The eviction was prayed for on four grounds including the ground for bona fide requirement. The Rent Controller ordered eviction on the grounds of bona fide requirement and that the tenant secured alternative accommodation as contemplated under Sec. 10 (2) (v) of A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short the Rent Control Act ). RCA 10/80 filed by the tenant was allowed. Then the landlord preferred CRP 151/83. The same was allowed and the matter was remanded to the appellate court for considering afresh in regard to the following two points viz. , (i) Whether the respondent landlord has got bona fide requirement for personal occupation of the petition, schedule premises and (ii) whether the appellant-tenant secured alternative accommodation. After remand the learned Subordinate judge held the two points in favour of the landlord. Then the tenant preferred this revision petition. As per order dt. 23rd March, 90. I held the second point i. e. , whether the appellant-tenant secured alterna











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top