V.NEELADRI RAO
N. Chenchuramaiah – Appellant
Versus
Syed Nawabjan – Respondent
( 1 ) THE tenant who is the respondent in R. C. 2/76 on the file of Rent controller (Principal District Munsif, Nellore) is the revision petitioner. The eviction was prayed for on four grounds including the ground for bona fide requirement. The Rent Controller ordered eviction on the grounds of bona fide requirement and that the tenant secured alternative accommodation as contemplated under Sec. 10 (2) (v) of A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short the Rent Control Act ). RCA 10/80 filed by the tenant was allowed. Then the landlord preferred CRP 151/83. The same was allowed and the matter was remanded to the appellate court for considering afresh in regard to the following two points viz. , (i) Whether the respondent landlord has got bona fide requirement for personal occupation of the petition, schedule premises and (ii) whether the appellant-tenant secured alternative accommodation. After remand the learned Subordinate judge held the two points in favour of the landlord. Then the tenant preferred this revision petition. As per order dt. 23rd March, 90. I held the second point i. e. , whether the appellant-tenant secured alterna
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.