SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 34

S.S.M.QUADRI
G. Munilakshmamma – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Chittoor District – Respondent


S. S. M. QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner was cultivating an extent of ac. 2. 67 cents in survey no. 50/2 and Ac. 2-30 cents in Survey No. 50/3 of Kagathi village which are Government waste lands. He was cultivating the lands as Sivaijamdar from 1978 but d Form Patta was granted in his favour on December 11, 1989. By proceedings Roc. No. 2114 of 1990 dated September 30, 1990, the Mandal Revenue Officer, Chowdepalli mandal, Chittoor district, the second respondent herein, called upon the petitioner to show cause as to why the patta granted in his favour should not be cancelled. It is the correctness of this show cause notice that is assailed in this writ petition on the ground that the second respondent has no power under Board Standing Orders to cancel the patta.

( 2 ) RESPONDENTS 4 to 11 were impleaded as the parties to the writ petition on February 4, 1991.

( 3 ) NO counter affidavit is filed by the respondents 1 to 3.

( 4 ) RESPONDENTS 4 to 11 filed a common counter affidavit raising various contentions with regard to the reasons which justify the cancellation of the patta granted in favour of the petitioner. Having regard to the question involved in the writ petition, I do not










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top