SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 50

SARDAR ALI KHAN, M.N.RAO
M. Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
Excise Superintendent, Hyderabad – Respondent


SARDAR ALI KHAN, J.

( 1 ) MR. M. Rajkumar, writ petitioner No. 1 is a licensee for the Arrack Unit Twin Cities Hyderabad District for the excise year 1990-91. Petitioners 2 and 3 claim to be owners of the premises of the shop situate at Osman Shahi in Survey No. 9/ 2, Ward No. 202 Block No. C of an extent of 382. 66 Sq. Yards.

( 2 ) THE case of the 1st petitioner, in a nutshell, is as follows:-- He was the highest bidder and auction purchaser in respect of Arrack Unit Twin Cities Hyderabad District of 128 arrack shops for the excise year 1990-91. Having completed all the formalities, the excise authorities granted licences in respect of other shops, except in respect of Osman Shahi arrack shop on the ground of non-acceptability of the premises. Then the 1st petitioner filed W. P. No. 13977/90 on 24-9-1990 which was allowed by this Court on 5-10-1990 directing the authorities to issue licence is respect of Osman Shahi arrack shop in the existing premises. Aggrieved by the order dated 5-10-1990 in W. P. No. 13977/90 respondents 1 and 2 herein and the Commissioner of Excise have preferred Writ Appeal No. 1223/90 which was dismissed on 29-10-1990, and the authorities were obliged to is










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top