UPENDRALAL WAGHRAY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two writ appeals are sled against the judgment of a learned single Judge in two writ petitions filed by the same petitioner. OB 12-6-86 W P no. 8963/81 was allowed granting a mandamus directing the two respondents therein, that is the Government of andhra Pradesh and the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, to initiate land acquisition proceedings in respect of survey numbers 7 and 13 situated at Thotaguda village, Hyderabad Urban Taluk; and on the same day the other writ petition No. 9793/83 seeking to quash the order of the Competent authority under the Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad, as confirmed by the appellate authority, was disposed of as unnecessary in view of the decision in the earlier writ petition. However, by a subsequent order dt. 21-10-86 the learned Judge has substituted the order in the latter writ petition by an order allowing it and giving a direction that in view of the judgment in the earlier writ petition the land in those survey numbers shall not be included in the Urban Land Ceiling of the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition has appeared in w A No. 1191/86 and the learned government Pleader f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document