Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Deccan Engineers - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 03-06-91
SALES TAX - EXEMPTION - CAST IRON - WHETHER CAST IRON CASTINGS ARE COVERED BY THE TERM CAST IRON - INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 14 OF THE CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT, 1956 AND SCHEDULE III OF THE ANDHRA PRADESH GENERAL SALES TAX ACT, 1957 - HELD, CAST IRON CASTINGS ARE NOT COVERED BY THE TERM CAST IRON.
Fact of the Case:
The assessee, a manufacturer of various goods made from cast iron, challenged the levy of State sales tax on the ground that the goods sold by them were covered by the entry relating to cast iron in section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule III of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that cast iron castings are not covered by the term cast iron as used in the entry in section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule III of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The court interpreted the word "including" in the entry to indicate an exhaustive list of items rather than an extension of the meaning of cast iron to include products made from it.
Issues: Whether cast iron castings are covered by the term cast iron as used in the entry relating to cast iron in section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule III of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the following principles in reaching its decision: * The word "includes" may be used by the Legislature to extend the meaning given in a definition clause, but it can also be used to indicate an exhaustive list of items. * In this case, the word "including" is used in section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, which declares certain goods to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce. This indicates that the Parliament intended to give a limited meaning to the term cast iron, rather than extending it to include products made from it. * The court also referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Tamil Nadu v. Pyare Lal Malhotra [1976] 37 STC 319, where it was held that every sub-item in an entry relating to declared goods could be a different commercial commodity and liable to sales tax separately.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the levy of State sales tax on the goods sold by the assessee.
( 2 ) THE controversy is about the interpretation of the entry relating to an item of section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and it is useful to extract it :"14. Certain goods to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce.- It is hereby declared that the following goods are of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce :- (i) to (iii ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (iv) iron and steel, that is to say, - (i) pig iron and cast iron including ingot moulds, bottom plates, iron scrap, cast iron scrap, runner scrap and iron skull scrap; (ii ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "
( 3 ) THE Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act provides for levy of tax on the declared goods in accordance with its section 6 read with Schedule III. Item 2 (i) of Schedule III is identical to the entry in section 14 of the Central Act referred to above.
( 4 ) THE counsel for the petitioner has also referred to (1) letter No. 24/14/76-ST, Department of Revenue and Banking dated 28/02/1977; (2) letter from Government of India in F. No. 24/10/80-CT dated 31/01/1984 and (3) Order of the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued under section 42 (2) of the State Act in G. O. Ms. No. 383, Revenue (S) Department dated April 17, 198 which are extracted hereunder : (1) "letter No. 24/14/76-ST, Department of Revenue and Banking dated February 28, 1977. To The Finance/revenue Secretaries of all State Governments/union Territories. Subject : Clarification as to whether the term cast iron mentioned in section 14 (iv) (i) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, would cover iron castings. In continuation of the marginally noted communication and with reference to this department s letter No. 24/3/73, dated 20/11/1973, I am directed to say that the question whether the expression cast iron used in section 14 (iv) (i) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, will include cast iron castings has been re-examined in consultation with the Director-General of Technical Development, Chief Chemist and the Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs. This department has been advised that the existing expression cast iron in the aforesaid section will cover cast iron castings also. Yours faithfully, Sd/- O. P. MEHRA, Deputy Secretary to the Government of India. " (2) "the Government of India in their letter F. No. 24/10/80-CT dated 31/01/1984, clarified after consulting the Ministry of Law and Director-General, Technical Development, that cast iron castings are covered under the term cast iron . The reference read as under : According to the Supreme Court judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Pyare Lal Malhotra [1976] 37 STC 319 the fact that the substance or raw material out of which it is made has also been taxed in some other form, when it was sold as a separate commercial commodity, would make no difference for the purposes of the law of sales tax. The object appears to us to be to tax sale of goods of each variety and not the sale of the substance out of which they are made. Therefore, even withou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.