SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 92

UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Deccan Engineers – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS revision under section 22 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, is filed by the assessee against the judgment of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 5/08/1988, in Tribunal Appeal No. 714 of 1987. The relevant assessment year is 1980-81 and the assessing authority, i. e. , the Commercial Tax Officer, had granted exemption from State sales tax in respect of sales by the assessee of C. I. specials, bends, ties, tail pieces, manhole covers, etc. The Deputy Commissioner, however, in exercise of his powers under section 20 of the Act, after giving notice to the assessee held that the exemption granted on the turnover in respect of these items was not correct and levied tax on it. The assessee carried the matter in appeal to the Tribunal, which has dismissed this and another appeal of the same assessee for another assessment year by a common judgment. The Tribunal has relied upon its several previous decisions on this question.

( 2 ) THE controversy is about the interpretation of the entry relating to an item of section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and it is useful to extract it :"14. Certain goods to be of special importance in inter-State trade or

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top