SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 89

P.L.N.SHARMA
Golla Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
Hari Joshi – Respondent


P. L. NARASIMHA SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) C. M. P. No. 2268 of 1991 was one filed under Section 5 of Limitation act to condone the delay of 242 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the sole respondent.

( 2 ) C. M. P. 2267 of 1991 was filed under Order 22, Rule 4 CPC to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the sole resdondent and C. M. P. No. 12529 of 1990 was filed to bring on record the legal representatives of the sole respondent in the revision.

( 3 ) IN the afidavit filed in support of the applications, it is stated that the advocate appearing for the sole respondent in the revision petition informed their Advocate by his letter dt. 22-3-1990 that the sole respondent in the revision petition died on 16-1-1990. Immediately thereafter, they caused enquiries and came to know that the said statement is correct and also on enquiries they came to know that the sole respondent died issueless and his brother s sons, viz. , the persons sought to be impleaded are the legal representatives to be brought on record. In view of the above, they prayed that the respondents may be brought on record as the legal representatives of the sole respondent.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top