P.L.N.SHARMA
Kanakappagari Chinnabha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
( 1 ) SUIT itself was filed for declaration of title of the plaintiff to the plaint schedule property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from interfering with peaceful possession of the plaintiff.
( 2 ) THE suit was based on the claim that the plaintiff purchased the property for a valuable consideration and the same was delivered to him and eversince the said date, be has been in possession and enjoyment there of in his own right and that the defendants are trying to interfere with his possession and enjoyment. The same was resisted by the defendants stating that it is Government Poramboke and that the same was assigned them by the Government and they have been in possession each of the extent of ac. 0-03 cents for over 40 years and that the plaintiff was never in possession.
( 3 ) THE Trial Court dismissed the suit. It held that P. W. 1 may be in possession of the suit site by the date of the suit, but he obtained possession not through legal means but by trespass. The learned Judge also mentioned that P. W. 2 might have accupied the suit site prior to the date of suit, but being a trespasser, he is not entittled to inj
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.