SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 113

V.BHASKARA RAO, RAMANUJULU NAIDU
Shaik Sardar – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


RAMANUJULU NAIDU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of Habeas Corpus to produce before this Court the body of the petitioner, hereinafter referred to as the detenu, after quashing the order dated 6th January, 1991 passed by the Second Respondent directing detcntion of the petitioner in the District Jail, Secunderabad, for a period of six months initially in exercise of the powers conferred upon him under section 3 (1) of the A. P. Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot leggers. Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and land-Grabbers Act 1 of 1986, hereinafter referred to as the Act, read with g. O. Rt. No. 4647, General Administration (General-A) Department, government of A. P. dated 21st December, 1990 and to set him at liberty forthwith. The impugned order of datention reads that with a view to preventing the detenu from committing dangerous activities which are prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, he was sought to be detained under Section 3 (1) of the Act. Sec. 3 (1) of the Act can only be invoked if the detaining authority is satisfied that the detenu answers the description

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top