( 1 ) THE petitioner who is one of the accused in Crime No. 104/85 of I town Police Station. Vizianagaram, was given pardon and taken as approver. The other accused were tried in Sessions Case No. 38/86 in the Court of the sessions Judge, Srikakulam, and during the trial, the petitioner was examined as PW 6. He has resiled from the earlier statement made by him before the Magistrate by whom the pardon was tendered to him. Therefore, on a certificate issued by the Public Prosecutor, he was tried for the main offence in Sessions Case No. 25/89 in the Court of the Sessions Judge, Srikakulam and was acquitted in that case. While acquitting the accused, the learned sessions Judge passed an order directing that he shall be prosecuted under section 193, IPC for giving false evidence and filed a complaint to that effect in the Court of the First Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, srikakulam, but the learned Magistrate had taken cognizance as C. C. No. 180/90. In this petition filed under Sec. 482 Cr. P. C. the petitioner contends that he cannot be prosecuted under Sec. 193. IPC without the sanction of the High Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner has poin