SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 97

V.SIVARAMAN NAIR
K. Sriramamurty – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Endowments, A. P. , Hydrabad – Respondent


V. SIVARAMAN NAIR, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER challenges order Re. No. B3/6811/90 E. Os. Estt. dt. 28-6-1990 of the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Guntur, whereby a clerk in the services of the Devasthanam was appointed by promotion as Executive officer. The main ground urged by the petitioner is that the power to appoint Executive Officers of Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments can be exercised only by the State Government under section 29 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and endowments Act, 1987. He submits that the State Government is not competent to delegate its power to the Commissioner or any of its subordinates. Reliance is placed on the decision of my learned brother Neeiadri rao, J. in Writ Petition No. 12488/89 dt. 6-7-1990.

( 2 ) EXECUTIVE Officer is defined in Section 2 (13) of the A P. Charita-ble and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, hereinafter referred to as the act , as an officer appointed as such under any of the provisions of this Act . Section 2 (6) defines commissioner deputy commissioner and assistant Commissioner are defined in Section 2 (9) and 2 (2) respectively of the Act.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top