SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 137

S.S.M.QUADRI
T. Venkataratnam Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Hyderabad Municipal Corporation – Respondent


S. S. M. QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner purchased a house bearing No. 3-5-997, Narayanaguda, hyderabad under a registered sale deed dated 12-3-1981 from its owner and possessor called Prakashbabu. He filed an application for mutation of his name in the municipal records under Section 208 of the Hyderabad Municipal corporation Act. It is stated that inspite of repeated requests mutation was not effected in the name of the petitioner. A notice was issued in the name of one Shiva Prasad for recovery of the tax for houses bearing door nos. 3-5-997 and 3-5-998, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad, raising a demand of rs. 17,266-50 and was served, on the petitioner seeking recovery of the amount. The petitioner challenged the correctness of the said notice in this writ petition.

( 2 ) SRI Vinyakumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that when the petitioner filed an application for mutation of his name in the municipal records in respect of the house, the respondent ought to have mutated the name of the petitioner and raised demand of tax after duly assessing the property tax in respect of house No. 3-5-997. The counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is not bou









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top