SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 128

V.BHASKARA RAO
Takkelapally Laxmamma – Appellant
Versus
Takkelapally Rangaiah – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition filed by the wife against the order of the court below dismissing her petition tiled under Section 125 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for recovery of the past maintenance for the period from 9-6-77 to 1-2-88.

( 2 ) THE brief facts necessary for disposal of this revision are ; The wife filed a petition under Section 125 Cr,p. C. , on 9-6-77 seeking grant of maintenance. After contest the petition was allowed on 9-12-88 granting the maintenance at Rs. 180/-per month from the date of application. That order has become final. In pursuance of this grant, the wife filed a petition under Section 125 (3) Cr. P. C. , on 9-1-89 for execution of the maintenance order. The court below holding that the wife is entitled to the maintenance from 1-2-88 to 31-1-89 (i. e. , for twelve months) dismissed the said petition under Section 125 (3) Cr. P. C. , so far it relates to the period prior to 1-2-88, Hence this revision.

( 3 ) MR. Mahesh Narayan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, sub-mitted that by a reading of first proviso Sec. 125 (3) Cr. PC. , it is clear that the petition for execution of the maintenance order has to be filed wi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top