JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal has been preferred by the writ petitioner against the order of the learned single Judge dated 29-5-1991 dismissing the writ petition.

( 2 ) THE writ petition was filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the sole respondent viz. , State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the secretary, Law (Courts) Department directing the respondent to issue a fresh notification calling for a panel of advocates for appointment of Public prosecutor in the Courts of the District and Sessions Judge, Adilabad from among advocates who have put in a minimum of 7 years of practice as per section 24 (3) read with Sec. 24 (7) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

( 3 ) THE following are the facts of the case: The petitioner enrolled himself as an Advocate with the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh on 9-9-1983. He has been practising in the Court at Sirpur town and Adilabad District court. The petitioner states that initially the Government came up with the proposal to appoint a Special Public Prosecutor and a Special Additional public Prosecutor in the above two courts. Under Sec. 24 of the code of Criminal procedure, a person should not have less than 10 year

Click Here to Read the rest of this document