Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : M.N.RAO, V.SIVARAMAN NAIR
Government of India - Appellant
Versus
P.Veera Raju - Respondent
W.A.Nos. 592 & 593/85
Decided On : 08-02-91
Advocates Appeared :
Mr. S.R. Ashok,Mr. Y. Suryanarayana
Held : In this case, the respondent joined service as far back as 1955 as a Lower Division Clerk claiming herself as a Konda Kapu, a recognised Scheduled Tribe. He was selected as a Class. III Officer to the post of Law Assistant by direct recruitment on 8-1-79 against a reserved vacancy. At that stage of selection it was necessary for the Railway Administration to have caused verification of his social status. Silence or inaction on the part of the railway administration during the period between 1955 and 1879 in not insisting upon acceptable proof about the social status of the respondent could not be a factor in favour of the respondent dis. entitling the railway administration from ceiling upon him to prove his social status. The principle of equitable estoppel has absolutely no application to cases of the present nature.
The inquiry conducted by the Revenue Divisional Officer regarding the social status of the respondent was clearly in breach of principles of natural justice. The Revenue Divisional Officer examined the Village Munsif and two others who stated that the respondent is not a member of a Scheduled Tribe but a Telaga by Caste, a forward caste. The transfer certificate issued by the High School as also the Intermediate admission Register of the College where the respondent studied, contained entries showing the respondent as a Telaga by Caste The evidence constituted chiefly the basis for the Revenue Divisional Officer to hold that the respondent is not a Konda Kapu. But unfortunately, the respondent was not apprised of this evidence, the statements of the witnesses were not furnished to him, nor was he given an opportunity to see the two documents. It is, therefore clear that the finding arrived at by the Revenue Divisional Officer as to the social status of the respondent was clearly in breach of principles of natural justice.
If an order is set aside on the ground that it is vitiated for violation of principles of natural justice, the matter must be remitted to the concerned authority for disposal afresh in accordance with law. Power to grant judicial review does not extend to the High Court substituting itself for that of the concerned authority.
Decision in W.A No. 473 of 1989 dt. 24-7-90 held per incurium.
W.As. Allowed
( 1 ) AS these writ-appeals are inter-connected the same are disposed of by this common judgment.
( 2 ) WRIT Appeal No. 592 of 1985 is directed against Writ Petition 5464 of 1982, and Writ Appeal No. 593 of 1985 is directed against Writ Petition 994 of 1980. The union of India, represented by the Secretary, Ministry or Railways the Railway Board represented by its Secretary, the General Manager, South Central Railway, The chief personnel Officer, South Central Railway, and the Senior Personal Officer, South central Railway, who are the respondents in the writ petitions, are the appellants herein. A learned Single Judge of this Court, Ramachandra Raju J. , by a common order, allowed writ Petition Nos. 994/80,2444/82 and 5464/82 filed by B. Veeraraju, the respondent herein.
( 3 ) THE following facts are necessary to understand the contentions that arise for consideration: The respondent joined service in the Railways on 20-12-1955 as a lower Division Clerk claiming himself to be a Kondakapu - a recognised Scheduled tribe. His recruitment was against a post reserved for members of Scheduled Tribes and it was based on the selection made by the Railway Service Commission. The respondent studied upto Intermediate and passed two in subjects. At the time of his selection he was required to produce SSLC certificate but he did not do so representing that the certificate was lost. He is a native of Eleswaram. Peddapuram Taluk, East Godavari District. He produced three certificates issued by three authorities viz. , (i) by the Revenue Divisional officer, Peddapuram on 26-1-1954; (ii) by the Additional District Magistrate, East godavari on 30-11-1954; and (iii) by the Special Magistrate, Peddapuram on 13-11-1955 in support of his claim that he is a Kondakapu. He was allowed to continue in service uninterruptedly without the railway administration making any further demand on him to produce his SSLC certificate. By 9-12-1977 he was holding the post of Head Clerk. In 1979, the Railway Service Commission conducted an examination for recruitment to the post of Law Assistant - a Class (3) post in Category - III- for which in -service candidates like the respondent also were eligible. Certain posts were reserved for members of Scheduled Tribes and the respondent applied for recruitment against the quota reserved for Scheduled Tribes. On 8-1-1979 he was selected as Law assistant against a reserved post meant to be filled up by a member of a Scheduled Tribe. As he was required to produce a certificate about his caste status, he submitted a certificate issued by the District Collector, Hyderabad which disclosed that he is a member of Kondakapu tribe. He did not produce the SSLC certificate. From Tahsildar, pathepadu, East Godavari District, he obtained a certificate on 14-3-1979 to the effect that he is a Kondakapu by caste. This certificate was issued by the Tahsildar based upon the earlier certificates obtained by the respondent during 1954-55 from the revenue authorities of Peddapuram.
( 4 ) IT appears, on a complaint received from the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled tribes Welfare Association, the railway administration initiated an inquiry against the respondent in respect of his caste status. The Revenue Department was requested by the railway administration to conduct an inquiry as to the genuineness of the caste of the respondent, and in compliance with that request, an inquiry was conducted by the revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapuram after issuing notice to the respondent. Three witnesses were examined by the Revenue Divisional Officer viz. , (i) Papiraju, Village munsif, Eleswaram; (ii) K Sitaramayya, a person associated with the family of the respondent for nearly fifty years; and (iii) N. Veeraiah, a member of the Gram panchayat. All the three testified that the respondent is a Telaga by caste and not kondakapu. The Transfer Certificate issued by ULCM School, Peddapuram in June 1948 (where the respondent studied) disclose
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.